|
Viewing the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement
An Addendum to the Final SEIS was issued on May 16, 2002.
Final SEIS - Table of Contents
Chapter 1 Summary
1.1 1.2 Purpose and Need for Project1.3 Changes in Project DescriptionProposed Action 1.3.2 No Action Alternative1.4 Public Involvement Since Issuance of the FEISScoping 1.4.2 Role of EFSEC1.5 Significant Areas of Controversy or Uncertainty and Issues to be Resolved1.6 Summary of Potential Impacts, Mitigation Measures, and Significant Unavoidable Adverse ImpactsChapter 2 Proposed Action and Alternatives
2.1
2.2 Project Description and Changes Since Issuance of FEIS
Chapter 3 Existing Conditions, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures Air Quality (Greenhouse Gases)
Existing Conditions 3.4.2 Environmental Impacts3.4.3 Noise Mitigation Measures WetlandsSources of Information 3.5.2 Existing Conditions3.5.3 Environmental Impacts of Proposed Action3.5.4 Mitigation Measures3.5.5 Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts Flooding PotentialExisting Conditions 3.6.2 Changes Related to Flood Modeling3.6.3 Environmental Impacts3.6.4 Mitigation Measures Faulting and SeismicityExisting Conditions 3.7.2 Changes Related to Faulting and Seismicity3.7.3 Environmental Impacts3.7.4 Mitigation Measures3.7.5 Significant Unavoidable Adverse ImpactsAppendix A: Section 401 Technical Evaluation Memorandum Appendix B: Public Comments and Responses
United States: USS—State USS1 Jeannie Summerhays, Washington State Department of Ecology: Letter, Response
USO—Nongovernmental organization USO1 Danielle Dixon, NW Energy Coalition: Letter, Response USO2 Brian Carpenter, REBOUND : Letter, Response USO3 Charles E. Martin, Sumas Energy 2, Inc.: Letter, Response USO4 Brad Owens, Northwest Building and Construction Trades Council: Letter, Response
USR—Resident: USR1 Kirk Deal: Letter, Response USR2 Marian G. Beddill: Letter, Response USR3 Marlene Noteboom: Letter, Response USR4 Candice Ambrosio and Dean Rogers: Letter, Response USR5 Lynn Peterson and Hugh Lewis: Letter, Response USR6 Connie Hoag: Letter, Response USR7 Joni Hensley: Letter, Response USR8 Mike Bozzo: Letter, Response USR9 Paige and Ladd Shumway: Letter, Response USR10 Margaret Curtis: Letter, Response USR11 Richard H. Severson: Letter, Response USR12 Bo Bumford: Letter, Response USR13 Darryl Ehlers: Letter, Response USR14 Andy Ross: Letter, Response USR15 Rolf B.G. Nilsen: Letter, Response USR16 Mike Kaufman: Letter, Response
Canada: CF—Federal CF1 Kirk Johnstone, Environment Canada: Letter, Response
CP—Provincial CP1 Margaret Eckenfelder, British Columbia Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection : Letter, Response
CL—Local government CL1 Patricia Ross, City of Abbotsford: Letter, Response
CO—Nongovernmental organization CO1 Lee Larkin, Chilliwack Field Naturalists: Letter, Response CO2 Mary Reeves, Abbotsford Downtown Business Association: Letter, Response CO3 Garry Dickinson, Huntingdon Duty Free Shop Inc.: Letter, Response
CR—Resident CR1 Les and Joan Hay: Letter, Response CR2 Andrea Mikulan: Letter, Response CR3 E. Herbert Warkentin: Letter, Response CR4 Heather Taylor: Letter, Response CR5 James Degen: Letter, Response CR6 James Degen: Letter, Response CR7 Rose Morrison: Letter, Response CR8 Laurie Hoekstra: Letter, Response2-3 Proposed Gas Line; Water Supply Line; Wastewater Line; 3.2-1 Land Use within May Road and Sumas Well Field Capture Zones 3.2-2 Geologic Profile of the Sumas Aquifer 3.2-3 Nitrate Concentrations in Sumas City Wells 3.3-1 Theoretical Radius of Interference: May Road and City 3.5-1 Plant Site – Existing Conditions 3.5-2 Wetlands Compensatory Mitigation Site Plan 3.6-1 100-Year Floodplain Area 3.7-1 Inferred Surface Traces of Sumas and Vedder Mountain Faults 3.7-2 Tectonic Setting of the Cascadia Subduction Zone 3.7-3 Cross-Sections of Earthquake Hypocenters beneath Western Washington 3.7-4 Epicenters and Dates of Larger Pacific Northwest Earthquakes
|